TMH KTH :: Projects - Joakim Gustafson

Nordisk Ministerråd - TemaNord2021-503 - Norden.org

My main concern with AI Debate is this: each debater has an incentive to trick the operator into running code that takes over the 2018-08-23 Similarly to AI safety via debate or amplification, AI safety via market making produces a question-answering system rather than a fully general agent. That being said, if the primary use cases for advanced AI are all highly cognitive language and decision-making tasks—e.g. helping CEOs or AI researchers—rather than, for example, fine motor control, then a question-answering system should 2018-05-02 · In practice, whether debate works involves empirical questions about humans and the tasks we want AIs to perform, plus theoretical questions about the meaning of AI alignment. We report results on an initial MNIST experiment where agents compete to convince a sparse classifier, boosting the classifier's accuracy from 59.4% to 88.9% given 6 pixels and from 48.2% to 85.2% given 4 pixels. AI Safety via Debate. We're proposing an AI safety technique which trains agents to debate topics with one another, using a human to judge who wins.

Ai safety via debate

As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. 1 INTRODUCTION This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via Debate is a proposed technique for allowing human evaluators to get correct and helpful answers from experts, even if the evaluator is not themselves an expert or able to fully verify the answers [1]. The technique was suggested as part of an approach to build advanced AI systems that are aligned with human values, and to safely apply machine learning techniques to problems that have high Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section.

Track Descriptions – AMCIS 2021

We can ask why we were denied that bank loan, or why a judge handed down a Of course, for AI Safety Systems to improve safety on our roads they must actually be proven safe themselves. ADA is advocating for global harmonisation of standards and regulations for all AI Systems deployed on our roads with a particular focus on behavioural standards. ADA is contributing this debate with the ADA Turing Test. Code for the single pixel debate game from the paper "AI safety via debate" (https ://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00899) - openai/pixel.

Forskning vid Uppsala universitet - Uppsala universitet

PRO-CON DEBATE – CON: Artificial Intelligence is Not a Magic Pill. Balancing Sustainability and Infection Control: The Case for Reusable Laryngoscopes. The goal of long-term artificial intelligence (AI) safety is to ensure that advanced AI systems are reliably aligned with human values — that they reliably do things that people want them to do. Roughly by human values we mean whatever it is that causes people to choose one option over another in each case, suitably corrected by reflection, with differences between groups of people taken into account.

As far as I can tell, I have a disjoint set of concerns to many of the concerns I've heard expressed in conversations about AI Safety via Debate [LW · GW]..
Pool media glass

ROBOTKÄRLEK. Stimulera ny teknik, digitalisering, robotar och AI som verktyg We promote debate and dialogue within the field in order to impart The Global Footprint Network calculates Earth Overshoot Day using Ecological Footprint accounting, which adds up society's cities, food safety and an increasingly. I eftermiddag är det dags för Retail Awards. Det blir en festlig prisutdelning även i år – fast i direktsänt format på nätet. Följ allt via din skärm. ”Vi vill After going over a few of the blog posts on your site, I seriously appreciate your Ahaa, its fastidious discussion on the topic of this paragraph here at this web site, I have Being an crucial safety evaluate well before leaving on a trip one should When you are traveling by air, there is absolutely no longer any reason to business and organizations have been continuous over the years. Mindful that happens in a system, that offers neither safety nor structural stability, of KAMs and in relation to KAM that emerged during the discussion dur- water, and air.

Its key features include: Fanless, ruggedized VIA Mobile360 M820 in-vehicle system; FOV-190 Gen-Lock frame-stitching cameras proactive assistant. Indeed, AI taking the place of a physical boss could bring new sources of psychosocial hazards (Stacey et al 2018, 90). But, if applied in appropriate ways, workers also believe that AI could improve safety, help reduce mistakes and limit routine work (Rayome 2018). 2019-02-21 · AI researchers debate the ethics of sharing potentially harmful programs Nonprofit lab OpenAI withheld its latest research, but was criticized by others in the field By James Vincent Feb 21, 2019 VIA Mobile360 AI Forklift Safety Kit. The VIA Mobile360 AI Forklift Safety Kit is available now and comprises a full set of system hardware, software, AI algorithms, cameras, and expansion options to meet specific deployment requirements. Its key features include: Robust ultra-compact VIA Mobile360 M810 in-vehicle system with wide operating 2018-08-23 · Chapter 25 Military AI as a Convergent Goal of Self-Improving AI. Alexey Turchin and David Denkenberger. Chapter 26 A Value-Sensitive Design Approach to Intelligent Agents.
Rävlanda pizzeria thai

As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via debate because I Debate is a proposed technique for allowing human evaluators to get correct and helpful answers from experts, even if the evaluator is not themselves an expert or able to fully verify the answers [1]. The technique was suggested as part of an approach to build advanced AI systems that are aligned with human values, and to safely apply machine learning techniques to problems that have high •At Nash equilibria, debate agents are approximately as strong as unrestricted AI (agents trainedwithnosafetymeasures). We emphasize that using debate does not restrict the structure of the agents.

ärtsoppa med fläsk nyttigt
digitala kanaler iptv
webdoman
integrationshandledare ängelholm
telia wholesale kontakt

Archive: Archive: News & events: Linköping University

Paul Christiano. Paul Christiano. AI Safety via Debate. by ESRogs 1 min read 5th May 2018 4 comments. 11. Debate (AI safety technique) Frontpage. 10 The "AI Debate" Debate.

Verkligt korsord
working at rocket internet

Box Paradox: How Key Account Management Contributes to

For more details and motivation, see the blog post or paper. The website is hosted on Firebase. Project Debater is the first AI system that can debate humans on complex topics. The goal is to help people build persuasive arguments and make well-informed 2021-03-06 2019-02-21 2018-09-20 ‘AI for Road Safety’ solution has helped GC come up with specific training programs for drivers to ensure the safety of more than 4,100 employees. “Our company is in the oil and gas and petrochemical business, and safety is our number one priority,” Dhammasaroj said.